[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]
Re: R: get a clue...
- Subject: Re: R: [amsat-bb] get a clue...
- From: k0vty@xxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 08:59:27 CST
Hi Dom
Can you tell me why the L ban does not have a Lelia to control the up
link ERP ?
Joe K0VTY
=======================
On Tue, 17 Dec 2002 15:00:35 +0100 "i8cvs" <domenico.i8cvs@tin.it>
writes:
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Lee <lee-fl@cfl.rr.com>
> To: <amsat-bb@AMSAT.Org>
> Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 4:07 AM
> Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] get a clue...
>
>
> > There are several things which I believe contribute to this
> problem.
> >
> > 1. In some cases it is an attempt to compensate for a simple lack
> of
> > receive sensitivity. Stations hearing the excessively strong
> L-band
> signals
> > don't realize how marginal their receive set up is.
> >
>
> Lee and Kevin,
>
> Many stations using L-band uplink are really at the same level or
> constantly
> stronger than the beacon by 6 dB or more all the time as i can see
> on my
> panoramic receiver wich is constantly connected to the IF of my 2400
> MHz
> downconverter and they are strong not because those stations
> hearing
> excessive strong L-band signals are using marginal receiver
> sensitivity but
> because those L-band signals are strong in reality including
> sometime my
> self.
>
> Excessive strong L-band signals are possible because LEILA do not
> operate
> for the L-band uplink and actually i can increase my L-band power to
> any
> level i like and i can be as many dB over the beacon i decide
> without the
> intervention of LEILA
>
> The problem is that many radio operators in the passband instead to
> disregard those stations using very high level downlink through the
> L-band
> congratulates instead with those L-band operators for their strong
> signals
> and they are happy to make QSO hearing strong signals so that the
> pile-up
> over a 6 dB or more signal over the beacon is higly populated and
> continuously operating particularly when the moon is not in range
> for some
> EME operators.
>
> Remember that if a signal is at the level or more than the beacon
> this
> signal is coming from the L-band uplink because LEILA do not operate
> in it.
> and is not coming from the U-band.
>
> > 2. The L-band rx AGC does not restrict users of this band to the
> recommended
> > MB-10db signal level. As a result some stations attempt to
> achieve the
> same
> > excessive levels using the 70cm uplink resulting in decreased
> U-Rx
> > sensitivity.
>
> Stations using excessive 70 cm uplink power cannot achieve the same
> excessive level of those using L-band because LEILA put a notch
> and
> the siren to the U-band offending signals for level just 8 dB belove
> the
> beacon. If i use the U-band uplink i cannot desense the U-band
> receiver and
> i cannot desense the L-band receiver at all because of the above
> LEILA
> limitations.
>
> Normally my 70 cm and 23 cm TX are ON all the time and some time i
> prefere
> to use the U-band uplink but as soon LEILA get a notch on me i can
> switch
> immediately to the L-band and i can continue to discusse with my
> friends
> even with a stronger signal over the LEILA siren using the L-band
> uplink !
>
> > 3. The U-rx AGC has been driven so high for so long that everyone
> now
> > considers it normal to run 4 to 8 times the recommended 100w
> EIRP.
>
> If i run 4 or 8 times more power than the recommended power for the
> U-band, LEILA put a notch on me and i get the siren on,so that
> i cannot desense the transponder using U-band but i can easily
> desense the
> transponder for everybody using the L-band because LEILA do not
> operate in
> it.
>
> Without LEILA for the L-band the actual EIRP depends only by a
> decision
> of the L-band operator but for the U-band operator is LEILA that
> decides.
>
> The difference existing between the limitation using high power on
> U-band
> because of LEILA intervention and the freedom of using any power in
> L-band
> without any limitation by LEILA make the operation of the AO40
> transponder
> impartial because the users become divided in to two different
> categories
> Those that are limited by a good impartial roule and those that are
> only
> limited by their roules.
>
> > Take a look at some AO-40 AGC data downloaded from the archive for
> this
> > month.
> > http://home.cfl.rr.com/lmclamb/ao40agc1202.html
> >
>
> A test of desensing was made by G3WDG, DJ1KM, 4X1AS and my self
> some monts
> ago and this indicates that using U-band the SSB is mostly affected
> by LEILA
> and that CW or a steady carriers like SSTV are less affected by
> LEILA for
> example.
>
> > Lee-KU4OS
>
> Lee and Kevin
>
> I cannot understand why i should have the freedom to overload and
> desense
> everybody in the passband using the L-band and i cannot do the same
> using
> the U-band because of LEILA and i cannot understand why LEILA is
> not
> operating for the L-band or cannot be switched time to time between
> the
> U-band and the L-band in a more balanced operating democracy.
>
> Technical problems or what ?
>
> 73" de i8CVS Domenico
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "kevin schuchmann" <kschuchm@pacbell.net>
> > To: <amsat-bb@AMSAT.Org>
> > Sent: Saturday, December 14, 2002 16:55 PM
> > Subject: [amsat-bb] get a clue...
> >
> >
> > > Hi All,
> > > could people please get a clue on AO40? everyone has run too
> much
> > power
> > > at one time or another
> > > including myself... but I try not to... yet there are stations
> that are
> > > always way too loud... pass after pass... I'm talking beacon
> level
> here...
> > >
> > > GET A CLUE!!! tune down and look at the beacon, I don't care
> what your
> > setup
> > > is... it doesn't matter..
> > > but look at that beacon... see where it is on your meter??? be
> under it
> by
> > > at least a couple s units....
> > >
> > > and another thing,everyone loves to praise cw, how it can get
> through
> > when
> > > ssb wont cut it.... then how come so many cw stations are
> beacon
> level???
> > > DUH!!!
> > >
> > > I'm sure that a lot of people have seen this behavior and have
> seen the
> > > results... agc clamping the passband... and splatter and images
> on the
> > > passband....
> > >
> > > If you only get the beacon a s unit or two above your noise
> guess
> what...
> > > you need to fix your receive and probably shouldn't be on the
> sat till
> you
> > > fix that....
> > >
> > > ok rant mode off... shields up!!
> > >
> > > Kevin
> > > WA6FWF
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ----
> > > Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of
> AMSAT-NA.
> > > To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to
> Majordomo@amsat.org
> >
> > ----
> > Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
> > To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to
> Majordomo@amsat.org
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ----
> Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
> To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
>
>
________________________________________________________________
Sign Up for Juno Platinum Internet Access Today
Only $9.95 per month!
Visit www.juno.com
----
Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
AMSAT Home