[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]
The Other Answer Re: ISM interference on 2401 MHz
- Subject: The Other Answer Re: [amsat-bb] ISM interference on 2401 MHz
- From: "Gary \"Joe\" Mayfield" <gary_mayfield@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 16:16:20 -0600
It is interesting that no one in this thread has nibbled on the bait I threw
out. The other simpler, cheaper, easier (and maybe better) answer is mode
B.
One commentor lamented that AO-40 is not near as active as AO-13 was (this
has been my experience as well). The truth is mode B is easier to do which
results in more users. The common mode S downlink approach is to build a
mode B station and then put a downconverter in front of it. Why not just
use the mode B station?
The amount of interfering items in the S band is ever increasing. The
amount of interference on two meters has leveled off and is starting to
decline. Mode B allows for much simpler antennas where pointing is not as
critical. Mode J is plagued by pirates on the uplink, this has not been a
problem on mode B. In band amateur use of two meters is on the decline (I
believe this is true of almost every band) making local congestion less of a
threat.
I worked mode B on AO-13 it was a blast! I have been on mode S since
AO-40's transponder was turned on. I have not been impressed.
This is just my personal opinion, but I can't help but think there is a
large group of others who agree.
Flame suit is on, so fire away.
73,
Joe
ka0yos@amsat.org
----
Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
AMSAT Home