[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

Re: Experience with K3TZ patch -> updated webpage



Wow, that's cool.. especially since you are (as you stated) really 
overilluminating that dish.

Good thing I've held on to those two DSS dishes and the Primestar dish!

Fred W0FMS


>From: K5OE@aol.com
>To: avollhar@physik.unizh.ch, fspinner@hotmail.com
>CC: amsat-bb@AMSAT.Org
>Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Experience with K3TZ patch -> updated webpage
>Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 18:29:17 EST
>
>I did a direct comparison to a helix feed about 6 weeks ago and reported it
>here on the BB then.  I threw together a quick page with some pictures to
>show what I did:
>http://home.swbell.net/k5oe/K3TZ_patch/K3TZ_patch.htm
>
>It took me about 2 hours start to finish, including a trip to the hardware
>store and testing.
>73,
>Jerry, K5OE
>
>
>avollhar@physik.unizh.ch writes:
>
> > Hi Fred and all the others!
> >  Thank you all for your comments and replies. Domenico, I8CVS and Fred,
> >  W0FMS stated, that a clear comparison between the G3RUH and the K3TZ
> >  design is only possible if you mount them both in a 2 ft. dish for 
>similar
> >  boundary conditions.. and you are absolutely right. For two reasons, I
> >  started nevertheless with the RHCP non-dish version of the patch:
> >
> >  1. I witnessed a bare patch reception at the workshop in Marburg last
> >  November and wanted to make the experience myself.. sat RX with an 
>antenna
> >  no bigger than a small plate. You really don't believe it unless you 
>try
> >  it yourself!
> >
> >  2. As I said, from idea to patch,there were less than 24 hours.. in 
>fact,
> >  as soon as I soldered the patch onto the BNC pin I ran outside for the
> >  reception tests.. as you seen on the side view photo, I didn't even had
> >  time to glue in those 3mm spacers under the patch. As I knew I would 
>run
> >  short of time, I decided to build a RHCP patch and save the time for
> >  constructing a patch mount.. although this will take me another hour 
>only.
> >
> >  Thank you again for your feedback. The patch mount is next on my list, 
>you
> >  can be assured..hi!
> >
> >  73s Achim, DH2VA
> >
> >  On Mon, 18 Feb 2002, Frederick M. Spinner wrote:
> >
> >  > If you mount this to a feed of a dish, let us know the results.  I'm
> >  > interested in "how much better" a G3RUH patch is than the K3TZ 
>"cropped
> >  > corner" type.  The bare patch to G3RUH/dish comparison is 
>unfortunately
> > like
> >  > an apples to oranges comparison.
> >  >
> >  > Fred W0FMS
> >  >
> >  >
> >  >
> >  > >From: Achim Vollhardt <avollhar@physik.unizh.ch>
> >  > >To: AMSAT Bulletin Board <amsat-bb@AMSAT.Org>
> >  > >Subject: [amsat-bb] Experience with K3TZ patch -> updated webpage
> >  > >Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 17:11:10 +0100
> >  > >
> >  > >Hi all,
> >  > >last weekend I built the K3TZ patch and made some tests with it
> >  > >receiving AO-40.. This patch looks really good!! I compared the 
>plain
> >  > >patch with a G3RUH patch in a 2ft dish and lost only signal from S9+ 
>to
> >  > >S5 (with noise floor being S1). Telemetry copy was solid, SSB 
>contacts
> >  > >were close to being copyable... with the patch only!!
> >  > >
> >  > >See my updated webpage for some photos (all the way down on the 
>page):
> >  > >
> >  > >http://gulp.physik.unizh.ch/ao40
> >  > >
> >  > >
> >  > >Try it out yourself, easy to build and great performance.
> >  > >Many thanks to Tim, K3TZ for this design!
> >  > >
> >  > >73s Achim, DH2VA
> >
>----
>Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
>To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org




<html></html>


_________________________________________________________________
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: 
http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx

----
Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org



AMSAT Top AMSAT Home