[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

Re: Recent launch failures

This is not only happening in the aerospace industry, it is also
happening in government and many other places.  In many
agencies in the government they offer these elaborate
inducements to get the higher paid, skilled, knowledgeable,
etc. to go to early out, etc.  The ones that leave are the ones
that can find better paying, more interesting jobs, and now
do so with a cushion under them.    A lot of this was done
at the demands of congress to downsize and streamline
and to turn things over to industry that used to be done
by government employees.  NASA, DOD, DOE, and
many of the other agencies/departments with largely
technical missions have undergone an AMAZING brain drain 
n the last decade.  It is not good.


At 01:00 AM 8/1/99 -0500, you wrote:
>I received this from a mailing list dedicated to amateur built rockets. 
>Since we launch our satellites on rockets which have shown a tendency to
>blow up of late, this may be of interest to AMSAT-BB readers.
>      Subject: recent launch failures
>         Date: Sat, 31 Jul 1999 08:15:16 -0700
>         From: Stewart Cobb <stu@IntegriNautics.COM>
>     Reply-To: erps-list@LunaCity.com
> Organization: IntegriNautics
>           To: erps-list@LunaCity.com
>Aviation Week's web site has several articles by longtime editor
>William B. Scott about the "crisis in aerospace".  Well worth
>reading.  The gist is that aerospace systems are too complicated
>to build and run without smart, talented, creative, motivated
>engineers.  In the past, such people were drawn to aerospace for
>the challenge.  Today they can find challenges elsewhere, and
>they're leaving the 1950's-style rigid, hierarchichal management
>policies of the old-line aeropacee companies for aerospace
>startups (ERPS) or non-aerospace (internet) careers.
>"Multiple failed space launches during the last year
>have triggered several technical and safety investigations
>into "processes" that affect quality, but the real,
>more-subtle causes may be found in how the aerospace
>industry handles its people, according to experts
>who have studied problematic programs."
>"Experience can mean the difference between a program's success
>and failure....  Managers and human resources departments should
>resist a "plug-and-play" philosophy that assumes like-credentials
>translate to equal abilities.  Aerospace has unintentionally rid
>itself of critical software engineers and programmers, for example,
>"and I don't think the companies even know they're gone,"
>said Michael C. Davis....  "They've [often] eliminated the really
>smart guy who's holding everything together, simply because he's
>making 20% more than the guy next to him. But they may have
>eliminated 40% of their overall software knowledge for a 20%
>savings," Davis said.  "That's been going on for 10 years.
>That's why rockets blow up." 
>Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
>To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org

Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org